Martindale Awards

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale Ratings

Average Peer Rating

4.8/5.0

Average Client Rating

Reviews (17)

Showing 4-star reviews and above
Review Us
Our reviews are compiled from our profiles on the legal directory Lawyers.com.

Site Rating Reviews by date
5.0 / 5.0
2012-02-28 11:05:58

No description provided

— Peer 02/28/2012

5.0 / 5.0
2011-10-14 12:44:06

I know Mr. Iseley well from my practice of construction law and construction litigation in Jacksonville, Florida. He is knowledgable, diligent, professional, and personable, and a pleasure to work with as an opposing attorney. He has good legal judgment and analytical ability. He has solid experience in his field of construction law and litigation and communicates well.

— Peer 10/14/2011

5.0 / 5.0
2011-10-07 14:17:18

Mr. Iseley is an very knowledgeable and skilled lawyer. He practices law ethically and professionally. I would recommend him to any of my clients.

— Peer 10/07/2011

5.0 / 5.0
2011-10-06 10:50:37

No description provided

— Peer 10/06/2011

5.0 / 5.0
2011-09-21 12:28:34

Christopher Iseley possesses all of the tools of an outstanding advocate in any court. He has an excellent command of the law, works hard on the case, writes extremely well and has a fantastic courtroom presence. He is one of the most experienced and knowledgable construction lawyers I have met in 24 years of practice. I would not hesitate to recommend him to anyone.

— Peer 09/21/2011

5.0 / 5.0
2011-09-20 09:14:08

I highly recomend Christopher J. Iseley for the designated AV Rating

— Peer 09/20/2011

5.0 / 5.0
2011-09-20 08:04:02

No description provided

— Peer 09/20/2011

4.8 / 5.0
2011-12-07 09:34:01

No description provided

— Peer 12/07/2011

4.8 / 5.0
2011-10-06 14:10:48

No description provided

— Peer 10/06/2011

4.8 / 5.0
2011-09-20 09:04:31

No description provided

— Peer 09/20/2011

4.6 / 5.0
2013-02-12 18:03:53

No description provided

— Peer 02/12/2013

4.6 / 5.0
2011-10-16 21:38:44

No description provided

— Peer 10/16/2011

4.6 / 5.0
2011-09-22 11:14:54

No description provided

— Peer 09/22/2011

4.4 / 5.0
2009-07-18 08:25:48

No description provided

— Peer 07/18/2009

4.2 / 5.0
2011-12-15 06:37:06

No description provided

— Peer 12/15/2011

4.2 / 5.0
2011-09-20 10:22:24

No description provided

— Peer 09/20/2011

4.0 / 5.0
2011-09-20 07:21:54

No description provided

— Peer 09/20/2011